Posted by: | Articles Comments Off on The Algorithmic Gatekeepers: Why Sharing Your Health Journey on Social Media Can Get You Censored
The Algorithmic Gatekeepers: Why Sharing Your Health Journey on Social Media Can Get You Censored
In an age where personal stories and experiences are shared instantly across the globe, it might come as a surprise that some of the most personal journeys – those related to health and wellness – are often met with strict scrutiny and even outright censorship on social media platforms. Many content creators find themselves walking a tightrope, trying to connect with their audience while navigating a complex web of platform policies.
The Social Media Minefield: Health Discussions Under Fire
Platforms like TikTok, Instagram, and YouTube have become central hubs for information and community. However, when it comes to discussing health, especially topics that touch on sensitive medical conditions or alternative treatments, creators often face a harsh reality. One content creator recounted how a simple update to his followers about his personal health process, intended to keep them informed and engaged, was met with swift action from platform moderators.
The Forbidden Words: ‘Cure,’ ‘Cancer,’ ‘Remedies’
According to the creator, certain words act as immediate red flags for these platforms. Mentioning terms like “cure,” “cancer,” or “remedies” in the same breath can instantly trigger algorithmic review, leading to videos being flagged or removed. The speaker’s own video was taken down because, as he was told, it seemed like he was “pushing” something or “acting like a doctor.”
This is a critical distinction that often gets lost in moderation: the difference between sharing a personal experience and offering medical advice. The creator emphasized, “I said I don’t endorse these guys, this is just what I’m taking.” Yet, even with this clarification, the content was deemed problematic.
Who Benefits From the Silence?
The creator expressed confusion and frustration, noting that he sees other videos discussing similar topics that remain online. This inconsistency raises questions about the transparency and fairness of moderation policies. A theory put forth suggests that these strict rules might be influenced by larger financial interests. “The platforms don’t like it… because it might take money out of the pharmaceutical giants’ pockets,” he speculated.
This perspective highlights a broader debate about free speech, public health information, and the role of tech giants in shaping narratives. While platforms aim to prevent the spread of misinformation and protect users from potentially harmful advice, the current approach can inadvertently stifle authentic personal stories and discussions that could be valuable to others seeking information or community.
For content creators, the challenge remains: how to share a genuine, personal health journey without running afoul of the algorithmic gatekeepers and the powerful interests they may represent. It’s a delicate balance between transparency, engagement, and navigating the often-unseen forces that dictate what can and cannot be said online.
Disclaimer: The info in this article may or may not be true. This was taken from a conversation from The Grind It Up Podcast and should not be used as your reliable news source but rather entertainment.
This info can be found in this episode of The Grind It Up Podcast
Listen on your favorite platform:
No Comments